The Trick Behind the Curtain: How to Reverse Engineer What Mark Carney Is Really Doing

By Tom Marazzo

The federal government’s 2035 ban on gas-powered vehicles is now locked in.

Under Trudeau, it looked like ideological overreach. But with Mark Carney stepping in as Canada’s next anointed leader, it now looks like something worse:

An engineered transition from freedom to permission.

Carney doesn’t talk like a populist or a politician he talks like a CEO managing the wind-down of an obsolete division. That division is called your way of life.

The gas vehicle ban is not an environmental policy. It’s not even a transportation policy. It’s a trigger one piece of a broader strategy to eliminate private ownership, restrict mobility, and enforce a digital system of control.

But to understand what’s really going on, you need more than suspicion. You need deductive reasoning the ability to reverse-engineer government policy to see the endgame, not the headline.

Step 1: Ignore the Narrative. Track the Action.

The story they tell you is for emotional effect. The truth is in the execution.

They say we need to ban gas cars to fight climate change. But no serious effort has been made to:

• Expand the power grid to meet future EV demand.

• Build rural charging infrastructure.

• Scale up domestic mineral extraction for batteries.

• Address affordability for working Canadians.

And Carney former central banker, WEF golden boy knows this.

Which means the failure to deliver a functional transition isn’t a policy gap. It’s the plan.

Step 2: Project the Consequences of Full Implementation

If the 2035 ban is enforced, and no gas-powered vehicles are allowed to be sold:

• Millions of people will be unable to replace their cars.

• The grid will buckle under the pressure.

• EV supply will fall far short of demand.

• Rural mobility will collapse.

So what happens?

The majority of Canadians won’t drive. Not because they don’t want to but because they won’t be allowed to.

This is not a conspiracy. It’s the mathematical outcome of Carney’s agenda if carried to completion.